Re: Greetings you FAA mavens


Wayne G. Walker <walker@...>
 

Hi Dave, Don and All:

I recently went through a fairly comprehensive examination of this very
issue -- can a friend lease me his Long-EZ, if not on an hourly basis, on a
lease-purchase or conditional sales contract basis?

There isn't much I could find in the FAR's except for the following
definition:
"Commercial operator" means a person who, for compensation or hire, engages
in the carriage by aircraft in air commerce of persons or property, other
than as an air carrier or foreign air carrier or under the authority of Part
375 of this title. Where it is doubtful that an operation is for
"compensation or hire", the test applied is whether the carriage by air is
merely incidental to the person's other business or is, in itself, a major
enterprise for profit.

That, coupled with the general prohibition for using experimentals for
compensation or hire, didn't seem to exclude our contemplated lease
purchase.

So, just to be sure, we contacted Avemco. The agent checked with his
supervisor. They didn't see any problem as long as we sent Avemco a copy of
the lease for their files.

That was good, but I decided to check further. So we called the Van Nuys
office of the FAA. One of the information specialists took my call. He did
a little research and got back to me. "No problem," he said.
Are you sure? I asked.
"Of, course. Such a lease is incidental and not the primary business of the
lessor."
"What if I give him money?" I asked.
"We don't want to hear about it," he replied.
"Will you put all of this in writing?" I asked.
"No."

Hmm...

In the end, we decided to hold off on the lease. My personal opinion is a
lease purchase would be all right, but an occasional lease with some
specified hourly rate, might not. Better still would be a conditional sales
contract with all respsonsibility for insurance held by the purchaser. But
in any event, if there is a claim under the insurance policy, I am confident
there would be a legal challenge instigated by the insurer.

I also decided that before going down either of these paths, I would want to
see written confirmation from an attorney at FAA headquarters, as well as
from the insurer, agreeing to the coverage regardless of how any FAA agent
interpreted the regs.

Regards,
Wayn "Luke" Walker
temporarily EZless

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-canard-aviators@...
[mailto:owner-canard-aviators@...]On Behalf Of D. Rothrock
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 8:40 AM
To: canard-aviators@...
Subject: Re: [c-a] Greetings you FAA mavens


[The Canard Aviators's Mailing list]


My Airworthiness certificate states under (B) No person may conduct flight
tests under this certificate: (1) Carrying persons or property for hire.

No where else does it make reference to commercial use except on Form
8130-7. (Operating Limitations). There it states in No. 13. This aircraft
shall not be used for glider towing, banner towing, or intentional parachute
jumping.

Don




I know this lawyer who wants me to point to the FAR that says we can't
usean
Amateur built aircraft for any commercial purpose - i.e. we can't lease it
..............

&#92;
->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>-|-
/
-For details on sponsors of this list, copyrights, and how to remove
-yourself from this list, please visit:

http://www.canard.com/canard-aviator-sponsors.html

(c) 1997,1998, 1999 Canard Aviators. support@...
/
-|-<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
&#92;

Join canard-aviators@canardzone.groups.io to automatically receive all group messages.