Re: 4130 supplier
patch
Rowan yuu won't get an answer at that website. Vortex Generators and the sqaure engine mounts were designed and built by Art Bianconi. Sadlly, Art is no longer with us. Not sure why his website is still up. There are some problems with fabricating the engine mounts. But easily solved Many Many people have built them. If you will wearch the Canardaviators.com website, there are solutions and pictures on there to show you what you are getting into. One of the problems is it moves the mounting points and a standard LEZ engine mount no longer works. The mounting points are in the wrong location. There are some other small challenges that have been overcome. Check out the canardaviation form. You will find most of the answers you seek there.
On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 1:41 PM, row row catchrow@... [canard-aviators] <canard-aviators@...> wrote:
|
||
|
||
Re: Tilting the autopilot
Bruce Hughes
HI Phil
Thank you VERY, VERY much for your email. My test pilot wants the ball in the center. I am a very low time pilot, and may lose my license (depends on congress) so I wanted to keep him happy. I have realized a way to make it adjustable without machining anything. I would be using flox and adjust it while it is still soft enough to do the job. Next day it would be hard and set correctly. I will ask you when I really need some machining. BTW Where can I buy a really good "cookie cutter" Mine is OK but will grab when almost through the aluminum. I think there is a better way to do it. Thanks again. Bruce On Sun, 3 Jul 2016 18:18:18 -0500 "PC uh1cw2@... wrote: BRUCE, I flew with the plane on an 11 degree tilt for a decade whenever I used the autopilot. It made it easier to see the ground out of the left side of the canopy. So it’s a little crooked, just hold some right rudder and enjoy the view.
|
||
|
||
Need to get on canard-aviators@yahoogroups.com
Joe Rosa
|
||
|
||
Re: Tilting the autopilot
PC <uh1cw2@...>
BRUCE, I flew with the plane on an 11 degree tilt for a decade whenever I used the autopilot. It made it easier to see the ground out of the left side of the canopy. So it’s a little crooked, just hold some right rudder and enjoy the view.
If you send me a drawing of what you need I’ll machine it and send it to you, no charge.
Phil
From: canard-aviators@... [mailto:canard-aviators@...]
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2016 1:56 PM To: canard-aviators@... Subject: [c-a] Tilting the autopilot
Hi Group
|
||
|
||
Re: Tilting the autopilot - Never mind, I have it
Bruce Hughes
HI Group
After considering the situation, I have thought of a solution which I am sure will work. So don't bother answering; I have it. Part of the problem is that I am putting a lot of instruments in a very small panel area, which you are aware of. Bruce Hughes
|
||
|
||
Re: Chapter 9 - Finally Done
Slick Ric <bkut540builder@...>
Helluva job! We are home now. Ric
From: "David Kissick geckoinc99@... [canard-aviators]" To: yahoogroups Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 11:26 PM Subject: [c-a] Chapter 9 - Finally Done For most people, I imagine Chapter 9 (Landing gear and such) is probably
not as big of a deal, but it proved to be my chapter from hell. I
started this chapter in Dec. of 2014. Since then, I was hospitalized a
week for a paralyzed colon that put me out of building for three months,
lost my job, gained a new job but with a longer commute, and have had
three foster children placements. I also suffered having to deal with
the mounting tab tube inserts not being parallel and having to fix that
(still don't know where I went wrong, but glad to be done). With the
exception of a couple of nutplates I need to install and the wheel pants
which I will do at a later date, I finally can consider the chapter
done and move on. To be fair, I also did add two things that are not
covered in the plans (mainly the gear leg fairings and the intersection
fairing). Just felt the need to say that perseverance does pay off.
I'm also very appreciative of all the help that I received during this
time getting questions answered and people checking out my parts.
Website is updated for those that want pictures. Thanks!
|
||
|
||
Re: 4130 supplier
Wayne Hicks
From: row row catchrow@... [canard-aviators] ; To: ; Subject: Re: [c-a] 4130 supplier Sent: Sun, Jul 3, 2016 3:42:32 PM
On Sunday, 3 July 2016, 16:19, "CozyGirrrl@...
[canard-aviators]" wrote: Some years ago we searched for this material and found that it was not available at that time, from any manufacturer, if at all. I do know they have been made from cold roll steel square tubes. We were asked to make these and we decided not to based on two issues, the first being the weld of the 3/4" x 3/4" plug in the end of the tube was all that secured the mount in each corner and second, our mounts with the additional tubes added to prevent the inevitable cracks/breaks do not have the ability to run a bolt through the center of the mounting stubs. We are not so concerned about the weld any more but still our mounts would not be suited to this mounting style. -----Original Message----- From: Dale Martin Niceez@... [canard-aviators] To: canard-aviators Sent: Sun, Jul 3, 2016 9:27 am Subject: Re: [c-a] 4130 supplier Rowan,
Are these for a new installation or is this R & R (remove and replace). The difference is match existing holes or just drilling them in the standard place.
Adios y vaya con Dios!
On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 11:41 AM, row row catchrow@... [canard-aviators] <canard-aviators@...> wrote:
|
||
|
||
Re: Pmag/magneto cotter pins
Tim Andres
No *sigh*, this is not a new failure mode, it's old news. I just wanted to make sure it got its due attention from anyone that missed earlier. Improperly installed or sized, same problem across any gear driven Slick, Bendix, Pmag, Electroair, LSE. Yes, EMGair shot themselves in the foot on this earlier by shipping the smaller cotter. Tim Andres
On Jul 3, 2016, at 12:47 PM, 'Marc J. Zeitlin' marc_zeitlin@... [canard-aviators] <canard-aviators@...> wrote:
|
||
|
||
Tilting the autopilot
Bruce Hughes
Hi Group
I have made several small aluminum panels. I prefer to NOT pull the entire panel if I need to change an instrument or check wiring. My latest Altimeter-and-autopilot panel is about 6.5" wide by 3.5" high. I don't have proper tools so it is not easy to make one. I do have a "cookie cutter" but I need a better designed cutter; this one binds. I probably need to sharpen the blade. I have found that the autopilot is very slightly tilted so the ball goes to the left. Soon I will make separate panels for the altimeter and autopilot. So does anyone have a neat design that allows one to adjust the tilt AFTER the autopilot is installed? Could you send a pdf file? Thank you for any comments. Bruce Hughes
|
||
|
||
Re: Pmag/magneto cotter pins
Marc J. Zeitlin
Tim Andres wrote: With another episode of cotter keys coming out of a Pmag posted over on VAF, I thought I'd repost this. If you are running a Pmag, you need to check that it has the proper cotter key installed, it's installed tight (no wiggle), and has no tool marks on it. Sigh. 12 years into development/production and they're still finding new ways to screw up on a design that hasn't changed architecturally since it was first designed. I love the idea, but the implementation, not so much. Using the wrong cotter pin? In a design that hasn't changed on magnetos in what - 60 - 70 years? Where the part # for the correct cotter pin is well known? How is this excusable? I also find it fascinating that they state, on the page above:
This, to me, is an implicit admission that they had a MFG problem, as I pointed out to them when my last unit failed a few years ago - the last sentence is a coded message for "our QC sucked, we were machining shafts incorrectly and didn't know it. It's up to YOU to inspect your units to determine if we screwed up". After telling me that my engine was the cause of the problem; that they didn't want me using Pmags on my aircraft and that their machining was perfect and that something in my engine was causing the bearings to fail (even though the bearings were fine and the shaft was the problem) they now admit that their MFG was the issue. Unbelievable. There is no amount of $$$ you could give me to put one, much less two of these things on the engine in my aircraft given the other choices out there for EI's. Yes, there are many folks out there that have them without issues, and if you have a good one, you MAY be OK into the future (unless you have one of the degenerative issues they've admitted to). But the failure rate among airplanes to which I've been exposed is somewhere in the 5 - 10% range, if not higher, within the first couple hundred hours of usage. Would you accept that failure rate on any other safety critical component on your airplane? If you want an EI, get a Lightspeed, EFII or SDS system, depending upon your current needs and eventual upgrade desires.
|
||
|
||
Pmag/magneto cotter pins
Tim Andres
With another episode of cotter keys coming out of a Pmag posted over on VAF, I thought I'd repost this. If you are running a Pmag, you need to check that it has the proper cotter key installed, it's installed tight (no wiggle), and has no tool marks on it.
This can easily happen on a slick or Bendix also, but EMGair was shipping them installed or supplied with an improper cotter pin. There is a service bulletin on the web site: http://www.emagair.com/service-notes/ See also: http://www.vansairforce.com/community/showthread.php?t=139501 http://www.vansairforce.com/community/showthread.php?t=122810&page=5 I'm using the slick part number cotter pin on mine: ACS # M2556 Tim Andres
|
||
|
||
Re: Lycoming O360 A4M core value
Hennie Engelbrecht
Tim you reminded me of things important
|
||
|
||
Re: Lycoming O360 A4M core value
Tim Andres
My mistake, haven't seen a roller tappet engine yet. Bumps your core value some I imagine. Tim Andres
On Jul 3, 2016, at 11:29 AM, rhlmnnr@... [canard-aviators] <canard-aviators@...> wrote:
|
||
|
||
Re: Lycoming O360 A4M core value
Hennie Engelbrecht
Omitted service letter number L220C
|
||
|
||
Re: Lycoming O360 A4M core value
Hennie Engelbrecht
Tim said:
" So from the s/n that's a narrow deck engine. Wide decks end with "A"" No, according to service letter the E indicates wide deck with roller tappets. If it was narrow deck it would only be -36. The A indicates wide deck without roller tappets Hennie
|
||
|
||
Re: 4130 supplier
row row
Thanks Chrissi, It is defiantly available in the States. Getting it in the UK is the issue. I am building my own mount, so sorry, no worries about compatability! Cheers, Rowan
On Sunday, 3 July 2016, 16:19, "CozyGirrrl@... [canard-aviators]" wrote: Some years ago we searched for this material and found that it was not available at that time, from any manufacturer, if at all. I do know they have been made from cold roll steel square tubes. We were asked to make these and we decided not to based on two issues, the first being the weld of the 3/4" x 3/4" plug in the end of the tube was all that secured the mount in each corner and second, our mounts with the additional tubes added to prevent the inevitable cracks/breaks do not have the ability to run a bolt through the center of the mounting stubs. We are not so concerned about the weld any more but still our mounts would not be suited to this mounting style. -----Original Message----- From: Dale Martin Niceez@... [canard-aviators] To: canard-aviators Sent: Sun, Jul 3, 2016 9:27 am Subject: Re: [c-a] 4130 supplier Rowan,
Are these for a new installation or is this R & R (remove and replace). The difference is match existing holes or just drilling them in the standard place.
Adios y vaya con Dios!
On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 11:41 AM, row row catchrow@... [canard-aviators] <canard-aviators@...> wrote:
|
||
|
||
Re: 4130 supplier
row row
Brand new installation Dale.
On Sunday, 3 July 2016, 15:27, "Dale Martin Niceez@... [canard-aviators]" wrote: Rowan, Are these for a new installation or is this R & R (remove and replace). The difference is match existing holes or just drilling them in the standard place. Adios y vaya con Dios! On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 11:41 AM, row row catchrow@... [canard-aviators] <canard-aviators@...> wrote:
|
||
|
||
Re: 4130 supplier
cozygirrrl
Some years ago we searched for this material and found that it was not available at that time, from any manufacturer, if at all.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I do know they have been made from cold roll steel square tubes. We were asked to make these and we decided not to based on two issues, the first being the weld of the 3/4" x 3/4" plug in the end of the tube was all that secured the mount in each corner and second, our mounts with the additional tubes added to prevent the inevitable cracks/breaks do not have the ability to run a bolt through the center of the mounting stubs. We are not so concerned about the weld any more but still our mounts would not be suited to this mounting style.
-----Original Message----- From: Dale Martin Niceez@... [canard-aviators] To: canard-aviators Sent: Sun, Jul 3, 2016 9:27 am Subject: Re: [c-a] 4130 supplier Rowan,
Are these for a new installation or is this R & R (remove and replace). The difference is match existing holes or just drilling them in the standard place.
Adios y vaya con Dios!
On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 11:41 AM, row row catchrow@... [canard-aviators] <canard-aviators@...> wrote:
|
||
|
||
Re: Lycoming O360 A4M core value
trcsmith <TRCSmith@...>
Just out of range for free.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Tom Smith A&P/IA
Long-EZ N12TS Cell-707-592-0869 KVCB KJ6PZN
-----Original Message-----
From: rhlmnnr@... [canard-aviators] <canard-aviators@...> To: canard-aviators Sent: Sun, Jul 3, 2016 1:57 am Subject: [c-a] Re: Lycoming O360 A4M core value Tom said
"If it's in northern California I'll look at it for free."
Thank you Tom! the engine is unfortunately in Perth Australia
Andrew said
"
Short Answer:
If its airworthy, then $8000
It it isn't, then $1500."
I would put it in the not airworthy basket for the following reasons
1. the engine is not complete
2. it was certainly not preserved after removal
Tim said
"It's hard to say without knowing the time on the present rebuild (logs?)
I can find that out
"the engine model and s/n"
Engine Model O360 A4M; S/n L-221912-36E
and most important why was it removed?
Not a hundred percent sure of this-I will check
" Where is it now and how long has it been not running and is it pickled?"
It is in workshop-aircraft service centre
it was removed May 2014
"You mention it has a servo so is it fuel injected?"
My mistake- it has a carburettor-definitely not fuel injected
"If it was a Lycoming rebuild then you do know it has first run cylinders and camshaft on it since they do not reuse them, "
It was
"and at 6K hours it's likely several other parts have been replaced by now also, like crankshaft, case etc."
looks li
ke it according to the logbook and AD's completed- I will check this
I do have the S/N so I will see what I can get from Lycoming
Thanks for the inputs thusfar
Hennie
|
||
|
||
Re: 4130 supplier
Dale Martin
Rowan, Are these for a new installation or is this R & R (remove and replace). The difference is match existing holes or just drilling them in the standard place.
On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 11:41 AM, row row catchrow@... [canard-aviators] <canard-aviators@...> wrote:
|
||
|