Re: NACA Inlet question
Bill James
More Fun,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
A forward facing opening is not always an inlet, and an aft facing opening is not always an exit. Bill James
On Sep 1, 2021, at 5:59 PM, David A Froble via groups.io <davef=tsoft-inc.com@groups.io> wrote:
|
|
Re: NACA Inlet question
David A Froble
Or, another example.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
The large doors on my barn/hangar face basically North. Many times I leave them open, even when it storms, and many storms come from the NW. Things don't get blown around, well, much. Why, there is no place for the air in the barn to go, so, more cannot get in.
On 9/1/2021 6:34 PM, Bulent Aliev wrote:
Hallelujah! I have been preaching it, but everyone is obsessed with NACA --
David Froble Tel: 724-529-0450 Dave Froble Enterprises, Inc. E-Mail: davef@tsoft-inc.com DFE Ultralights, Inc. 170 Grimplin Road Vanderbilt, PA 15486
|
|
Re: NACA Inlet question
Bulent Aliev
Hallelujah! I have been preaching it, but everyone is obsessed with NACA shapes, oil flows, VG’s etc. if you don’t have low pressure exit (pull), it ain’t going to work, Or just barely on the limits.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 4:09 PM Bill James <bill@...> wrote:
--
|
|
Re: NACA Inlet question
Bill James
Good topic.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Just passing through from left field.
“Almost any inlet will work if there is low pressure, or low enough pressure aft of the cooled element. And almost no inlet will work if there is high enough pressure or restriction aft of the cooled element. It is exactly
like pulling rather than pushing a rope.” Bill James
|
|
Re: NACA Inlet question
Todd Carrico
Here’s an option for you… No to NACA… Thanks!
|
|
Re: NACA Inlet question
Steve Rothert
For those of you who still remember how to do Calculus and Differential Equations (which excludes me), I refer you to a NACA report, from 1948, titled "An Experimental Investigation of the Design Variables for NACA Submerged Ducted Entrances" by Emmet Mossman and Lauros Randall. Figure 6 (see attached) shows "deflectors" as one of the variables.
My $.02 worth. Hope this helps. Steve
|
|
Re: NACA Inlet question
Joe Dubner
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 02:59 PM, Bob Holliston wrote:
I had those corners on the NACA for awhile (mainly because IThat does it for me; I will cut them off on my next opportunity (too hot for anything these days). When I builtI'd like to see that. If you'll fly to Independence some time I'll buy lunch. Of course, if you fly to Aurora on a second Saturday, Gil would buy lunch <g>. (Inside joke -- you gotta know Gil Hutchison.) Damnit, I wanted a FREE LUNCH!See above. And flying to Hood River is an option for me -- sorta, kinda: I'm still in Phase I.
|
|
Re: NACA Inlet question
Roch LaRocca
I think not! I love experimenting on my own plane but only to solve a problem…. Which I don’t have at the moment.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I did add a camera to the back of the plane so I could see what I just missed. ….;) Rock
On Aug 3, 2021, at 17:43, Michael Carra via groups.io <mjc342=aol.com@groups.io> wrote:
|
|
Re: NACA Inlet question
Bob Holliston
Yes and yes. I had those corners on the NACA for awhile (mainly because I noticed Klaus did) and noticed no difference so I cut'em off. When I built a new lower cowl a couple years ago I incorporated dedicated tunnels (two into four) that blow on the cylinders. The cooling is better than with the ramps but the OT is now 190 instead of 180. Damnit, I wanted a FREE LUNCH! With the tunnels it is easier to tweak them than the ramps to even up CHT's Three of my cyls. are around 338 - 349, with one at 318 in cruise so I need to shrink the low one.... when I get the ambition. Also, with the ramps the CHT's were only about 15 F higher, so not that bad.
Thanks Don, Roch, and Todd. Three in the plus column; no negative (so far). Thanks too, Bob -- you make four. --
|
|
Re: NACA Inlet question
Michael Carra
Here’s an option for you… No to NACA…
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Do you want more air coming up through your cylinders? Think F-104 Starfighter. Use the sump blisters under the armpits and try this… See attached picture. Add ramps to the inside of the cowl to kick the air up between the cylinders. My engine has run at low temperatures for years. Thanks to Vern Simon… Michael Carra Long EZ N342MC Advanceservicesproductions.com
On Aug 3, 2021, at 13:48, Joe Dubner via groups.io <jdubner=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:
|
|
Re: NACA Inlet question
Joe Dubner
Thanks Don, Roch, and Todd. Three in the plus column; no negative (so far). Thanks too, Bob -- you make four.
I did try VGs ahead of the beginning of the ramp but when I designed and placed them in accordance with this Kitplanes article (https://www.kitplanes.com/vortex-generators-for-cooling/) they were honkin' huge and wound up being mounted on the speed brake. Totally unsatisfactory but they did improve airflow somewhat. I'd like to see a picture of others' VGs if they are effective. My oil flow tests show outflow at the inlet with air spilling over the little "strakes". Maybe it would be worse without them, maybe not. I'm tempted to take Bob H's advice and cut them off for comparison. Bob, you have an O360 Long-EZ with no particular cooling issues, right? Maybe we can talk.
|
|
Re: NACA Inlet question
Bob Holliston
Rock, one way to find out for sure is to do a before and after (you cut them off) comparison. You can always glue them back on.
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 12:22 PM Todd Carrico <tcarrico.cozy@...> wrote:
--
|
|
Re: NACA Inlet question
Todd Carrico
On Aug 3, 2021, at 12:48 PM, Joe Dubner via groups.io <jdubner=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote: I remember Klaus talking about adding something like that, with good results. If you need more air into the inlet, VG’s close to beginning of the “ramp” seem to be the hot ticket. Tc
|
|
Re: NACA Inlet question
Roch LaRocca
I think it’s designed to prevent overflow and channel more air in. I actually have this on my aircraft and it seems to work great for me. I don’t ever have cooling issues so it must do something right.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Rock L ERacer N382RB
On Aug 3, 2021, at 13:48, Joe Dubner via groups.io <jdubner=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:
|
|
Re: NACA Inlet question
DON JONES
Those little strakes are there to help contain the air flowing into the cowling. Oil flow tests have shown that without them air escapes the cowl inlet in the corners. Hope this helps. Don Jones Berkut FG
On Tuesday, August 3, 2021, 01:48:58 PM EDT, Joe Dubner via groups.io <jdubner@...> wrote:
The attached photo is a Long-EZ NACA inlet. Has anyone seen a geometry like the parts I've circled? What is their purpose? Is there any basis in science for them? (I'm tempted to cut them off to get more air into the cowl.) Attachments: Annotated NACA Inlet.jpg: https://canardzone.groups.io/g/members/attachment/335/0
|
|
NACA Inlet question
Joe Dubner
The attached photo is a Long-EZ NACA inlet. Has anyone seen a geometry like the parts I've circled? What is their purpose? Is there any basis in science for them? (I'm tempted to cut them off to get more air into the cowl.)
|
|
Re: R/H45 Foam
Hi Ricardo & Steve,
Unfortunately I need the 5/8” H45. Thanks for the response though! -Matt
|
|
Re: R/H45 Foam
Matt, I just checked our stock here at AeroComposites and Greg and I do have some of the H45 foam in 5/8. How big of a piece do you want? Ross
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 7:02 AM Steve <josteve100@...> wrote:
--
Thank You! Ross Burk 307-277-4642 cell
|
|
Re: R/H45 Foam
Ricardo Elvas Martins
Hi Matt and all, I have the following pieces of foam: 02EACH F500-035 3/4X24X48, H45, 3#, DIVINYCELL P FOAM 01EACH F500-055 1/4X26X39-1/4-H100, 6# BLUE FOAM 04EACH F400-085 0.2X12X48, 18LB YELLOW FOAM The foam was bought from Wicks and is located at Cascais, Portugal. Call Ricardo at +351932660600 or email me at rimartinsri@.... Thank you, Ricardo Martins
|
|
Re: R/H45 Foam
Steve
Matt, I have some substantial scraps of 1/2 inch Corecell M foam that I am using on the Dory. It would work well on airplanes I'm sure but it isn't 5/8. How big of a piece do you need? Steve
|
|